UGLYPEAR AI completes its business upgrade: High-Performance Document Compression × RAG Data Engineering PlatformLearn about the New Business →

Core Capabilities

Eight interlocking capabilities covering every meter of the journey from documents to knowledge

1. High-Precision Parsing

One entry for six formats, scanned documents readable, tables stay intact

The wide variety of enterprise document formats is the first hurdle in knowledge base construction. The platform ships with DeepDoc layout analysis (dual ONNX models for layout + table structure recognition, inferred locally), parses PDF, Word, Excel, PPT, OFD and XPS — six major formats — into structured data, preserving heading hierarchy, paragraphs, table row-column relationships (including merged cells) and reading order; scanned documents are recognized automatically via OCR.

6 typesUnified format parsing
Dual modelsLayout + table structure recognition
Automatic OCRAutomatic recognition for scanned documents
0.924Three-layer parsing QC measured total score
// Parsing output example (excerpt) { "title": "Product Technical Manual V3.2", "elements": [ { "type": "heading", "level": 1, "text": "Chapter 1 Product Overview" }, { "type": "table", "headers": ["Model","Power","Voltage"], "rows": [["A100","500W","220V"]] }, { "type": "image", "description": "Product appearance diagram" } ] }

2. Document Cleaning

Keep noise like headers, footers and watermarks outside the knowledge base

Headers, footers, page numbers, watermarks, duplicate content — these are background noise to humans but pollution to AI: page numbers suddenly appear in answers, and retrieval gets disturbed by duplicates. The platform automatically marks and cleans this noise after parsing, and fills back a cleaning report — what was processed and what was removed is fully documented.

Headers/footers/page numbersAutomatically marked and removed
Watermark detectionReused AI detectors
Duplicate documentsContent-hash deduplication
Cleaning reportEvery step logged

3. AI Intelligent Redaction

13 categories of sensitive information, automatically masked before ingestion

Faces, ID cards, official seals, license plates, QR codes embedded in document images... letting them straight into the knowledge base is a serious leak risk. The platform reuses the compression engine's AI feature-protection detectors to automatically apply Gaussian blur/mosaic to sensitive regions before ingestion, and outputs a redaction report — what was detected in each image and where was processed is fully clear at audit time.

13 categoriesSensitive information detectors
Faces/ID documentsAutomatic blur masking
Seals/signaturesRegion detection and processing
Redaction reportLocation + method fully recorded

View the Full Data Security Framework →

4. High-Performance Compression

One pass, dual output: smaller files + cleaner knowledge

Compression is UGLYPEAR's core strength. Full coverage of 40+ formats across images, audio/video, PDF, Office, OFD, XPS and text, with an average compression ratio of 60% and up to 80%. Dual-metric SSIM/PSNR quality gating ensures smaller does not mean blurrier. For AI applications, image compression directly means lower multimodal inference token costs — measured savings of 85.9% on the GPT-4o basis.

60-80%Average compression ratio
40+File formats
SSIM≥0.92Quality gating
85.9%Image token savings

Learn about the SmartSlim Compression Product Family →

5. Intelligent Chunking

Different documents, different cuts — semantics stay intact, retrieval stays precise

Fixed-length chunking is the industry's most common pitfall: a sentence is cut off mid-way, and AI retrieving half a piece of information can only guess. The platform selects a chunking strategy by document type and ships with four sets of preset parameters, fine-tunable per business:

Document type Chunking strategy Special handling
Policies/contractsBy clauseConditions and conclusions inseparable
Technical manualsBy chapter + sectionModel/parameters/scope in the same chunk
FAQOne Q&A pairQuestion and answer bound together
Tabular dataBy row groupsRepeated headers with row-column relationships preserved
PPTBy pageTitle + body + notes together
Long reportsParent-child two layersRetrieve child chunks, generate with parent chunks

6. Metadata & Lifecycle

Every knowledge point carries its own ID card, and outdated knowledge exits automatically

After chunking, every knowledge point is automatically bound to metadata such as document title, chapter path, publication time, version number and source department, and receives four-level content enrichment (breadcrumb navigation, keywords, summary, hypothetical questions). Document updates go through incremental processing: new versions enter the knowledge base automatically, old versions are automatically down-weighted and marked outdated, and content hashes ensure the same document is never ingested twice.

Four-level enrichmentBreadcrumb/keywords/summary/HyDE
Version managementMulti-version archiving with rollback
Incremental updatesChanged sections automatically re-chunked
Freshness governanceOutdated knowledge automatically down-weighted

7. Permission Tagging

Who can see which knowledge, governed down to the knowledge-point level

Salary policies can be queried only by HR and management, and technical documents are isolated by department. The platform supports binding department, role, position, region and confidentiality-level labels to every knowledge point, and filters by permission before recall at retrieval time — permission checks happen at the data layer, not relying on the application layer's goodwill. The multi-tenant system naturally isolates knowledge bases of different customers/business units.

Knowledge-point levelPermission label granularity
Multi-tenantData naturally isolated
Pre-retrieval filteringFilter first, recall second
Filter previewPermission effects verifiable

8. Three-Layer Evaluation

Let numbers speak for knowledge base quality, and hold bad answers accountable

A knowledge base is not finished once built. The platform ships with a three-layer evaluation system: corpus level (parsing completeness, table structure rate, OCR accuracy, redaction coverage), retrieval level (HitRate@K, Recall@K, MRR, NDCG@K), and generation level (faithfulness, answer relevance, context precision). After a user gives a thumbs-down, attribution runs automatically: whether the problem lies in chunking, cleaning, redaction or metadata can be found out in one check, and badcases flow back into the evaluation set automatically.

Three layersCorpus/retrieval/generation
Regression gatesAutomatic regression on strategy changes
Negative-feedback attributionIssues located to the specific step
DashboardsQuality trend visualization

View Measured Data →

Want to see these capabilities run on your own documents?

Book a demo — seeing is believing

Book a Demo Integration & Deployment